Should Officiating Significantly Influence The Outcome Of A Game?
Nobody goes to a sporting event to watch the referees, umpires or officials. It’s just a simple fact of sports. People watch or attend games to root for their team, the athletes that play the game or the sport itself.
Yet, these days, officials seem to take more and more of the spotlight. And it’s not just Ed Hochuli and his physique!
Officials are necessary to police the game, and while they’re an important component to sports, they shouldn’t stand out. They should simply blend into the background and let players play the game.
But between video replay, coaching challenges and a greater attention to player safety, game officials have more influence over the outcomes of games than ever before, for better or worse.
As the emphasis on player safety continues to grow, it’s more important than ever for officials to help enforce and maintain proper rules. It is, after all, their job to ensure the game is played safely. And that’s especially true in sports today, where rules are constantly evolving to protect players.
Those rules, however, might be giving officials too much influence. By allowing them to have more judgment on things like contact and what constitutes a safe hit versus a dangerous one means there is no consistency in calls from play-to-play and game-to-game. Goals, drives, games and seasons sometimes come down to one official’s interpretation of an ever-changing rule or a judge being overly cautious.
And it’s not just professional sports, but all ranks and ages. Nothing is more maddening then watching your team’s defense end a drive with a great coverage play, only for the drive to be kept alive by a ticky-tack low hit on the other side of the field that didn’t affect the outcome. Or a power play that’s awarded for aggressive-looking contact that doesn’t actually cause any harm.
The same is true for things like instant replay and coaching challenges. There is a seemingly endless need for games to be played to perfection, with every call scrutinized and replayed over and over. But getting rid of the human error has only put a brighter spotlight on officials, particularly when calls are still made incorrectly after being reviewed.
In the past, a call was made or a call was missed. Those were just the breaks of the game, and athletes were taught to overcome the uncontrollable and keep playing hard. That’s what sports are all about; athletes and coaches are always striving for perfection, but athletics are simply random.
But instant replay is not going away. If anything, it is only going to increase in usage. And keeping athletes safe isn’t just a fad, but the present and future of sports. So the question becomes: Where do we draw the line on officials influencing the outcomes?
Officiating is frequently in the spotlight for determining the outcome of games. But should it be? Let us know what you think in the comments.